Resources
About Digital Publishing
- Adventures in Digital Publishing: Collaborations and Conversations: a web series exploring the creation of enhanced and interactive digital publications
- Multimodal Digital Monographs: Content, Collaboration, Community
- Born-Digital Scholarly Publishing: Resources and Roadmaps, an NEH Institute for Advanced Topics in the Digital Humanities
Funding
Guidelines for Peer Review
- American Academy of Religion, Guidelines for Evaluating Digital Scholarship
- American Historical Association, Guidelines for the Professional Evaluation of Digital Scholarship by Historians
- Association of University Presses, Best Practices for Peer Review
- Association for Computers in the Humanities, ACH Guidelines for Assessment of Digital Scholarship in Tenure and Promotion
- College Art Association, Guidelines for the Evaluation of Digital Scholarship in Art and Architectural History
- Middle East Studies Association, MESA Guidelines for Evaluating Digital Scholarship
- Modern Language Association, Guidelines for Evaluating Work in Digital Humanities and Digital Media
- Renaissance Society of America, Best Practices for Digital Scholarship
- Society for Classical Studies, Evaluating Digital Scholarship on Its Own Terms: A Case Study
- University of Michigan Press, Trusting the Process: Rethinking Peer Review for Innovative Scholarship
Digital scholarly publishing is a rapidly evolving enterprise. There is no prescribed roadmap to follow in the realm of enhanced born-digital publications. Brown is creating its own models and forging new partnerships — and that’s quite exciting.